Ok,
thanks you DV!
--
Highend
TextCrawler 2.0 Beta available for trying out
It's nearly perfect (for my needs)!
One small feature suggestion:
File - Options - Replace
An additional option for a backup directory for the .bak files. It could be a fixed one (all backuped files are going to e.g. (d:\backups) or a relative one (e.g. .\bak which puts all .bak files into a subdir for all replaced files respecting their directory structure).
If it's too much work for you, disregard it
Regards,
Highend
One small feature suggestion:
File - Options - Replace
An additional option for a backup directory for the .bak files. It could be a fixed one (all backuped files are going to e.g. (d:\backups) or a relative one (e.g. .\bak which puts all .bak files into a subdir for all replaced files respecting their directory structure).
If it's too much work for you, disregard it

Regards,
Highend
James, you are a badass! I have been looking for YEARS for a decent utf-8 regex batch replace, and this one actually works without mangling text. Will post bugs if I find them. Thanks!
I particularly like that \n backreference matches the clause and not the matched text. I see that you changed your default to utf-8 inistead of ansi - good move - so many utf-8 without bom's, and would require another utility...
I particularly like that \n backreference matches the clause and not the matched text. I see that you changed your default to utf-8 inistead of ansi - good move - so many utf-8 without bom's, and would require another utility...
> .23456
Very suspicious. Someday you'll have to explain your version numbering
One minor GUI improvement suggestion:
do those two input elements (the top one with the two tabs and the bottom one with the four tabs) have to stand out that much?
In my first try I searched desperately for the Find/Replace/Extract buttons because they look tiny below those two areas. Maybe those tab-holders would look nicer in a more "flat" mode and as a bonus that would make the buttons below appear more important. Just a thought.
Very suspicious. Someday you'll have to explain your version numbering

One minor GUI improvement suggestion:
do those two input elements (the top one with the two tabs and the bottom one with the four tabs) have to stand out that much?
In my first try I searched desperately for the Find/Replace/Extract buttons because they look tiny below those two areas. Maybe those tab-holders would look nicer in a more "flat" mode and as a bonus that would make the buttons below appear more important. Just a thought.