File Deletion is Slow
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2016 7:05 pm
File Deletion is Slow
Well, not really...
The actual file deletion seemed to go quite briskly.
Though the "entire" process was relatively long.
I believe the actual time consuming part was with the deletion of empty folders?
At least during the (what I going to say) actual file deletion, the count went from 0/183756 to 183750/183756 relatively quickly, but then there was a long lag (including disk activity) before the operation finally completed. And if the files were actually deleted during the quick part (which I believe to be the case), then seems the majority of the time was spent during the removal of empty folders (of which there were only 95 folders total to begin with, with 31 folders remaining after all was completed) [All remaining folders did in fact contain files.]
(My next set of files, I'll try disabling Remove Empty Folders & see what that does...)
Only 1800 files total in my next run, count went to 1800 & a few seconds later it was done.
I'll try to dig something up more representative...
Well, not really...
The actual file deletion seemed to go quite briskly.
Though the "entire" process was relatively long.
I believe the actual time consuming part was with the deletion of empty folders?
At least during the (what I going to say) actual file deletion, the count went from 0/183756 to 183750/183756 relatively quickly, but then there was a long lag (including disk activity) before the operation finally completed. And if the files were actually deleted during the quick part (which I believe to be the case), then seems the majority of the time was spent during the removal of empty folders (of which there were only 95 folders total to begin with, with 31 folders remaining after all was completed) [All remaining folders did in fact contain files.]
(My next set of files, I'll try disabling Remove Empty Folders & see what that does...)
Only 1800 files total in my next run, count went to 1800 & a few seconds later it was done.
I'll try to dig something up more representative...