Page 9 of 10
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 6:02 pm
by DV
Updated Beta
http://www.digitalvolcano.co.uk/downloa ... 2_beta.zip
The main addition is the option to send parameters to external apps when double clicking on a file. For instance you can get the app (eg. Notepad2) to jump to the first search hit in the file.
Hopefully this is the last beta before a proper release!
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 6:04 pm
by DV
ulm67 - I hope to eventually have language resource files in TextCrawler (similar to Duplicate Cleaner), but haven't done that yet in order to speed up development.
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 7:54 am
by Highend
Wow, command line parameters are really great!
My standard editor is EditPlus (
http://www.editplus.com/)
and the additional parameter line has to look like this:
[File] -cursor [Line]
Regards,
Highend
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 3:32 pm
by Preston
Noobie Noobenstein here....
I seem to be having some trouble getting the correct end result.
I need to delete the text between "START" & "END", whilst keeping
the text between "END" & "START", in the follwing excerpt of text:
START
N1737G01Z2.0154F600.
N1738Z2.F400.
N1739G00Z3.5
N1740Z2.1
N1741G01Z1.0154F600.
N1742Z1.F400.
N1743G00Z3.5
N1744Z1.1
N1745G01Z.0154F600.
N1746Z0.F400.
N1747G00Z3.5
END
N1749G01Z.0054F600.
N1750Z-.01F400.
N1751G00Z3.5
N1752G00X14.6076
START
N1754G01Z2.0154F600.
N1755Z2.F400.
N1756G00Z3.5
N1757Z2.1
N1758G01Z1.0154F600.
N1759Z1.F400.
N1760G00Z3.5
N1761Z1.1
N1762G01Z.0154F600.
N1763Z0.F400.
N1764G00Z3.5
END
Thanks,
Preston
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 8:48 pm
by Preston
Any assistance in this matter is greatly appreciated.
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 9:22 pm
by DV
Preston - a solution! This works in TextCrawler 2 (beta)
On RegEx Tab (Make sure 'Dot Matches Newline' is ticked -
Regex:
START.*?END
Replace:
START\r\nEND
Replace can just be blank if you do not want to keep the START/END tags.
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 6:56 am
by Rumbo
Did you see my post on page 5 about the GUI?
I just want to express my thoughts again for one reason: I like the program and its powerful functionality.
Compared to the previous version the v 2.0 looks somehow old-fashioned. Regarding its outstanding features it deserves something more light-weight that looks like "web 2.0"
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 12:29 pm
by Rumbo
Addition to my post above:
that refers to the look in XP with the Classic Design. Just tested in Win7, where it looks much better.
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 2:56 pm
by DV
That explains it - it does look a bit boxy in XP 'Classic'. I see it as the screenshot here (Windows XP default theme)
http://www.digitalvolcano.co.uk/content ... screenshot
But it depends on your windows theme/version.
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 6:04 am
by Rumbo
Yep, that's how it looks in the XP classic theme:
http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/9563/tc2xpc.jpg
So no offense, will upgrade to Win7 with this machine anyway
